SAINT ANDREW’S CHURCH
LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA

The Eve of Lent 1 [February 28, 2004]
Canon Richard T. Nolan

Meditation "The Dark Side of Lent: Negative Aspects of the Season"1

The Origin and Positive Purpose of Lent

         The term "lent" derives from an Anglo-Saxon word meaning "spring." As a liturgical season, its origin is rooted in the final period of preparation of candidates for their Easter baptism. Their preparation included acknowledgment of, and absolution for, their spiritual and moral shortcomings. By the late Middle Ages, Lent had become a period of penitential devotion for everyone, especially by abstaining from festivities, by fasting and almsgiving, and by dedicating more than the usual time to religious endeavors. In harmony with Jesus' own sorting out process as depicted in tonight's reading from Luke, Lent has evolved for the self-examination of one's fundamental values and priorities; it is not a time for self-punishment.

The Dark Side

         Nevertheless, we have heard centuries-old reports of dark excesses carried out not only in connection with Lent, but also more generally. Even now, we read of near-crucifixions as a contemporary Good Friday rite in some cultures. In Christianity (as well as other world religions) there is a historic twist of masochism expressed in a multitude of glamorized ways. Cultivated suffering and courted martyrdom are held up as exemplary. Countless clergy and laypeople continue to be drawn to this perversion of the Good News of Christ. Why, we might ask, do so many individuals prefer the dark side of Lent, indeed a dark side of historic Christianity?

Suffering From Internal Physical Sources

         Some people actually seek suffering because of their inborn temperament. For this type of person, religion is likely to be a very despondent matter. The subjects of death, sin, sacrifice, pain and anguish fit their disposition. It can be a matter of their glands, body chemistry, genetic predisposition, all clearly physical in nature, for which the individual has little personal responsibility. In any case, their suffering temperament affects their outlook on life as well as their religious convictions and practices. These Good Friday people are victims of an internal physical malady and live in a state of mild depression. They might not even realize that they have a problem - which a low dose of an antidepressant can often help. However, some are used to living that way and do not want to change.

Suffering from Psychological Sources

         Some other people seek suffering for neurotic reasons, such as the "martyr complex," which can be expressed in masochism - the enjoyment of pain. Masochism may involve deliberately inflicted deprivations of the necessities of life, tortures, collecting personal injustices, or even mutilations for the sake of religion.

          Listen to this illustration! Henry Suso (zõõ zõ), a fourteenth-century German mystic and ascetic, is an example of pathological extremes. Suso concocted for himself such discomforts as an undergarment studded with a hundred fifty brass nails, sharpened and so fixed as to pierce his skin; gloves with sharp tacks in order to discourage him from disturbing the harmful insects which were all over his body; a door to sleep on, and to make sure that this should not be too comfortable, a cross with thirty protruding needles and nails just under his body. In winter he slept on the bare floor of his cell and froze, his body covered with scars and his throat parched with thirst. He boasts that over a period of twenty-five years he never took a bath, and strove to "attain such a high degree of purity" that he would neither scratch nor touch any part of his body other than hands and feet. All these torments he endured "out of the greatness of the love which he bore in his heart to the Divine and Eternal Wisdom, our Lord Jesus Christ...." Ironically, a sense of spiritual superiority creeps into the psyche of many like Suso. However, the self-inflicted sufferings of Suso were clearly contradictory to the Good News of Christ. His only lasting value is in serving as an example of those many individuals tragically and mistakenly exalted by the Churches in dubious honor of their mental and spiritual aberrations.

         Folks like Suso suck the joy out of everything in their own lives. They are unaware of the deep sense of guilt and conflict they experience in their unconscious, but which is manifested in extreme self-punishing, self-denying, and self-defeating conscious behaviors. Such perversions of Christianity are usually characterized by anguish, guilt, sin, death and judgment, Good Friday, martyrdom, oppressive types of fasting and self-denial, gruesome statues, and other symbols depicting agony and torment. Uncomfortable in the Creator's universe, those so afflicted yearn for an escape from physical existence into a euphoric union with God or "Sacredness." Actually, comparable individuals living today could benefit greatly from long-term psychotherapy, perhaps continuing hospitalization.

          Mel Gibson's obsession with the torturing of Christ sounds very much like an expression of a severely neurotic, dark side of Christianity. That Jesus died a horrific death is undeniable. To want to film and watch the process is indeed dark. That the Creator demanded this form of sacrifice, which is one of the dozen or so traditional interpretations of the Crucifixion, I find repugnant and foul at every level. If this were an essential teaching of the Gospel, I would without hesitation renounce this religion.

Just Say No!

         Churchgoers who are not cultivated sufferers can simply stay away from observances that promote and glorify suffering, or they can try to tune out chronic negativity.

          A big problem with committed sufferers is that they have formed elaborate religious rationalizations to defend and justify this way of functioning. They usually dismiss psychotherapy as irrelevant to their circumstances. Moreover, they have a deep and abiding faith in their theologically "justified" suffering. Such wounded people reinforce their circumstances with ritualized "I am not worthy" ceremonial along with incorporating "sinner" within their most fundamental personal identity. Rather than accepting the obvious, that no creature is automatically worthy of God's holy and awesome presence, and that we all behave imperfectly, they perceive and focus upon "unworthiness" and "sinfulness" as basic to their spirit.

         Religious suffering attributable to temperament, neuroses, and dismal beliefs will most likely not disappear from this world! An inordinate number of people so inclined continue to be attracted to Christian churches. However, you and I can unconditionally reject this course as praiseworthy or exemplary. We need not respect such paths, just as we do not respect a sickness; nevertheless, we would maintain a genuinely caring disposition toward the sick person. When rituals and homilies that reinforce internal suffering are provided, healthy-minded people can firmly and confidently "just say no."

         In this regard, Lenten observances ought to be scrutinized carefully. Are they explicitly within the context of Easter - the pivotal event of the New Testament and the Christian life, or are they excuses to act out personal suffering as if inner torment were somehow commendable? The same measure may be applied to the various Christian "spiritualities" available to this very day; are they Easter oriented or Good Friday disposed, the latter an illness in the guise of solemn piety. If religious observances or spiritualities are found wanting, even detrimental, you and I can with a clear conscience decline to participate. Christians are called to healthiness, not sickness; to Light, not darkness.


1For the preparation of this meditation, I am indebted to my former seminary professor, the late Dr. Walter H. Clark, for his insights as a professional psychologist and psychotherapist. In his classical Psychology of Religion the following chapters are particularly relevant: "Two Roads to Religious Growth - Healthy Mindedness and Suffering," "Religion and Abnormal Psychology," and "Religion and Psychotherapy." The clinical information and example of Suso are from these chapters. Additionally, comments from a churchman who is a psychotherapist have been illuminating.