SAINT ANDREWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH, LAKE WORTH, FLORIDA

 

http://www.standrew-lakeworth.org/

 

UNDERSTANDING CHRISTIANITY

 

A monthly forum on the third Saturday of each month from 6:30 to 7:30 P.M. following Evening Prayer at 6

Forums with Dr. Richard T. Nolan

Retired Honorary Canon of Christ Church Cathedral, Hartford, and Retired Philosophy Professor and Writer

Editor of www.philosophy-religion.org

 

Saturday, March 16, 2002

 

WAS THE RESURRECTION AN HISTORICAL EVENT?

 

I. The Importance of Events to the Hebrew Mind

            a. the God Who Acts (including folklore, embellishments)

            b. the Exodus (including folklore, embellishments)

            c. the Resurrection (including folklore, embellishments)

 

II. The Problem of Evidence

            a. our possible reactions to U.F.O. claims

                        i.   belief

                        ii.  suspend judgment

                        iii. disbelief (fraud, hallucination, mistake)

            b. our possible reactions to a photo of the Resurrection

                        i.   belief

                        ii.  suspend judgment

                        iii. disbelief (fraud, hallucination, mistake)

            c. our possible reactions to:

i.   being present at the Resurrection: belief, suspend judgment, attempt at interpretation

                        ii.  first-hand observation of the Risen Lord: ditto above

                        iii. the testimony of others about the Risen Lord: ditto above

            d. the problem of all forms of evidence

                        i.   what does one find persuasive as criteria for evidence?

                        ii.  how is persuasive evidence to be interpreted?

 

III. Our Available Sources for Evidence of the Resurrection

a. the written testimony of others in a historical style (rather than as a parable, etc.)

i.  some disciples and contemporary people find persuasive – testimony regarding the empty tomb

ii. some disciples and contemporary people find persuasive  - testimony regarding first-hand observations of the Risen Lord

iii. some disciples and contemporary people find persuasive – testimony regarding the transfigured appearance (though the “physics” of the transfigured Jesus is beyond our knowledge)

iv. some disciples and contemporary people find persuasive – testimony regarding the transformation of the disciples’ despair changed to victory/joy

 

IV. How Do We Account for the Change from Despair to Joy?

            a. hallucination?          b. fraud?          c. mistake?      

d. wishful thinking/hysterics?     e. an event?

 

V. What Kind of Event?

            a. an external event (one that could be perceived via human senses)?

            b. an internal event (one that was emotional, an event of the heart)?

 

VI. Meanings of the Resurrection

a. external: Creator's unique intervention to place "stamp of approval" on Jesus as His Word for humanity; provides the hope of everlasting life for others; ultimate victory will triumph over ultimate defeat.

b. internal: encourages love, optimism, and rightness of Jesus' Way of life as the model for humanity.

 

VII. Our Individual Decision

            a. belief in external and/or internal

            b. suspend judgment about external and/or internal

            c. disbelief in external and/or internal

 

VIII. An Anglican Position (from www.philosophy-religion.org):

 

            We may wonder whether the Resurrection was an historical event. While it is incorrect to affirm every detail of the New Testament post-Resurrection accounts of Jesus as if they could have been photographed, it is equally mistaken to declare them all as subjective products of spirited fantasy or inner conviction. The post-Resurrection passages include actual persons, places, and incidents that could have been video­taped, among them Thomas, other disciples mentioned by name, a place of burial, and the Risen Christ himself. These passages also contain or imply wonder-filled meanings beyond the range of any human or camera lens. Within and beneath the Easter texts, whether statements referring to photographable incidents or metaphors based on a unique event, is this central Christian discernment: that at an actual time and place of the Creator's own choos­ing, God's intention for humanity (God's "Word" for everyone - Jew and Gentile alike), embodied in Jesus the Christ, was born, ministered to many, was wrongly executed for treason by the Roman govern­ment, and was raised from death in a transfigured, exalted form unknown to us. Jesus "entered a new order of life: one which does not and cannot occur as part of the present order of things."1  "...the resurrection of Christ was an objective event but of an unusual kind.  Although it was not simply an event in the minds of the disciples, yet it was not publicly observable.  Christ appeared only to chosen witnesses."2 In the New Testament the Resurrected Christ is depicted with "a body identical yet changed, without the usual limitations of the flesh yet capable of mani­festing itself within the order of the flesh."3  Thus, the Resurrection was an historical happening - even though the physics of this "divine sur­prise" is beyond our knowledge.  The meanings of the Resurrection are preached virtually every Sunday.

 

(1) Norris, Understanding the Faith of the Church, p. 137.

(2) Thomas, Introduction to Theology, 226.                                                                                                     

(3) quoted by Thomas, ibid.  

 

I Corinthians 15:14 “and if Christ has not been raised, then our proclamation has been in vain and your faith has been in vain.”